Awaiting Donald Trump: Forbidden Fruits of Forbidden City (Updated: Tiananmen)

A Chinese liberal plot to entice Trump with forged pieces of China's history, real estate land and a dick massage in the Forbidden City palace 紫禁城 on Sep 3.

*

Lilies for Donald Trump in Tiananmen’s forbidden rooms. Take your pick Donny…

*

Synopsis:

1. Entrapping Donald Trump in Beijing

2. The Sacred and the Profane in Tiananmen

3. A Chinamerica plot for a G2 global duopoly

4. CCG: Return of liberal Chinese globalists

5. MAGA Bananas versus CPC Confucianist

6. Steinbeck revisited: Ching Chong Chinaman

7. Quantum Huawei revisited: Superpositioning

8. Denouement in a CPC civil war

9. PRC grand closing down sale?

10. Xi Jinping imperilled?

*

1. THE SACRED

Things, places and people treated as hallow and sacrosanct by the Chinese have mostly to do with the dead.

Hallow is Qingming 清明. Sacrosanct is the ancestral hall in private homes, a room dedicated to housing the inscribed tablets to remember the dead, who are typically leading members of the family. The family altar, too, which is made to locate and honor the gods and ancestors are sacrosanct. Ditto, in public places, the clan temples.

The Great Wall is hallowed ground, so hallowed that we still sing songs to it today (video near bottom of post), 2,500 years after the first bricks were laid.

A thing sacred is therefore earned, not bestowed, and it is honored in the present day by the living so it would be passed on to the future.

The Forbidden City 紫禁城 ringed by Chang’an Avenue is hallowed ground, not because of any symbolism White people typically attach to such things but because it functioned for some 600 years since circa 1420 as the national center of administration and public life, such as the recruitment of officials after pre-qualifications in the system of imperial examinations. Though public access was restricted during the Qing and Ming eras, every Chinese today fondly remembers the City as gugong 故宫, the “old palace”.

To enter the palace, you first pass the national exams conducted, run and supervised by the court officials. After which, pray to be recruited into government service, the dream of every household from the lowly peasant family to the highest ranking official. The pressure is greater in the latter because failure would be a shame on the entire family.

Tiananmen at the proclamation of the People’s Republic, 1949 Oct 1

Situated at the northern gate to the Forbidden City palace, Tiananmen was used primarily by former emperors, total some 35 and their families, plus top echelon court officials.

This explains why Mao Zedong chose the balcony ontop the Tiananmen Gate 天安門 (image above) to proclaim the People’s Republic: On hallowed grounds lie the preservation and unity of the entire nation.

Today, every October 1, China’s national day, is observed at the same spot that fronts Tiananmen Square which in 1989 was defiled by a US-sponsored coup attempt.

At the root of this official custom at Tiananmen is Confucian ethical and political culture. Chinese ethics are not commandments handed down by some voodoo prophet standing atop some imaginary mountain. Instead, ethics are personally cultivated, starting in the family. Bad family, bad manners: garbage in, garbage out.

Tiananmen embodies political culture because the penultimate source and the formative unit of Chinese statehood (and other East Asian nations) is the family. Yet, conversely, without the state, there is no recognized, legal family that would be subject to the laws of the land and entitled to its protection.

The Chinese, therefore, characterize this tripartite political symbiosis of ruler, nationhood and family in the script form guojia 国家 = nation state/family wherein statehood 国 emerges once the ruler 王 is bounded inside the fixed four corners of the earth 囗.

This conception forbids the Chinese any external, hegemonic design or intent because a foreign territory is the nation 国 of another ruler to which China must respect if it itself is to be respected in turn. Thus, foreign occupations have no place in the Chinese political culture or consciousness; it would otherwise exist not only as totally alien but also anti-culture.

Logic inversed, and going by the same token, not a single inch of the Chinese nation will ever, ever, ever be surrendered to the foreigner, typically the White Man.

All land within the four corners of 囗 (read as wei) is either Chinese or it is not. National statehood is not a negotiated matter or an issue of (White Man’s) legal interpretation but of empirical and historical facts. Nor are Chinese borders, denoted as 囗, dependent on treaties or on the imaginations of some European bureaucrat making up names of nations, places and borders 10,000 miles from their own home.

For example, South Tibet 藏南 or zangnan is part of Chinese statehood in its origins and in the inhabitants; recall jia 家, the family, that’s the unit of the nation. You have only to look at the faces of the people or ask them or do a DNA test. So, for China to not recognize those families as Chinese within the Chinese nation is to concede that both government and State have abdicated their duties and responsibilities to those Tibetan families. This, under the Mandate of Heaven, is treason!

The Chinese nation, to repeat, is not dependent on some White motherfucker with nothing else to do but dream up some demarcation on a map, south of which, drawn on a so-called McMahon Line India then gave the name Arunachal Pradesh. Since when are empire lands, theft and loot transferable property from the White master to some chosen Coconut heads? What law is that?

Like Tiananmen, like the temple and the ancestral halls, and like qingming, Chinese land and statehood or guojia 国家 is, in a word, sacred. So, don’t fuck with China because the Chinese won’t give up, not even an inch.

The CCG Ching Chong Chinaman motherfuckers, from top to bottom: Jin Canrong, Victor Gao, Henry Wang. Every other day they have a lot to say and to pontificate about America but never once — not once — have they ever mention the word Gaza, or US involvement (with Israel) in the genocide there, much less speak of Donald Trump presiding over the daily mass murder of civilians, women and children. Last count of total dead Palestinians 400,000, today approaching 500,000.

*

2. CHING CHONG BANANAS

All the above is contextual background.

Now that we’ve gotten it out of the way, we can turn to two Chinese motherfuckers, both Anglophiles. Named here (farther below) because, as imitation Whites, they are simply the most loud-mouth representatives of the Anglophile class who the Chinese nicknamed Bananas, yellow skin outside, white consciousness inside.

A few Bananas, notably at the Commerce Ministry such as minister Wang Wentao 王文涛, are embedded in the halls of 中南海 zhongnanhai, the innermost sanctum of the Forbidden City and headquarters of the Communist Party of China (CPC) and government, the State Council, i.e the Cabinet. The rest squat in university classrooms and the media, all sponging on state largesse. Of the latter category are:

• 金灿荣 Jin Canrong, professor at the School of International Relations, Renmin University of China 中国人民大学国际关系学院. He sits on the advisory board of the Center for China and Globalization (CCG/全球化)

• 高志凯 Gao Zhikai alias Victor Gao, Chair Professor of Soochow University 苏州大学讲席教授, and deputy president of CCG/全球化.

Jin Canrong claims to an “expert 专家” on American studies. Perhaps he can recite the American Declaration of Independence by heart so there’s no need to quarrel with his claim. Or, perhaps he has read cover to cover John Steinbeck’s Cannery Row (1945, Viking Press):

Ching Chong Chinaman / sat on a rail. / Along comes a White man / to chop his tail.

Victor Gao spends half his adult life in London, living off a stipend as university professor and partly from government pension but mostly from serving an Anglo-American chattering class. His service to western, Anglophone media is based entirely on the fraudulent, deceitful claim he speaks on behalf of 1.4 billion Chinese. As a consequence, he is days and nights on television or YouTube platforms, giving interviews to a western propaganda machinery that few in China, if any, had heard of, watch much less.

In this video — titled, “Don’t Call the Chinese Peasants” — Gao tells an Anglophone audience that China is well passed its peasantry origin. He means to say China’s economic standing has changed, for the better, arguably as good as the West, if not better.

This was patently a false assertion and in inference since about one in two, or 600 million Chinese, still subsist on the land, directly, and 200 million more indirectly. At US$13,688, in China’s 2025 GDP per capita, Chinese income is less than the US$14,217 in world average, ranking it below Russia and next to Turkmenistan or Nauru.

It’s entirely plausible Gao’s claims were narcissistic and egotistical;

• (a) like his imitation White culture that he looks up to, the rural Chinese are inferior to him, and

• (b) believing he is above the lowly peasantry class, his attitude could only have come from his imitation Anglo-America because Chinese culture treatment of peasants is the exact opposite; the Chinese adore and look up to the peasants who signify relentless hard work, an indomitable spirit and economic independence.

Clearly, as Anglophile, Gao wanted no part of any “peasant” tag pinned on China by US vice president JD Vance who had used the term during a China-US trade war spat in April. The peasant is beneath Gao. But that’s not how the entire Chinese population feels. Many are proud to be labelled peasants because in Confucian social and political status hierarchy the peasant ranks higher than traders and merchants.

Like the Anglophiles of Hong Kong, Victor Gao feels contempt for a China who isn’t Sweden or Germany and in particular because, in China, there are no blondes. Gao had learned from his part-time employer Deng Xiaoping that eating with a pair of chopsticks is an inferior practise to the silver spoon and fork cutlery culture seen in NATO dinners (image below).

In Steinbeck’s world, though, or on a Hollywood street, Gao would be just another Ching Chong Chinaman — and still pandering to the White Man. But he would never ever be accepted as White, try as he did in London, even with a top hat on.

Back in China, he, like Jin Canrong and like all copycat, westernized liberal arts professors, he has nothing useful to teach Chinese. Teach what anyway? Balance of power politics? Economics supply and demand curves? All the ideas you could just as well pick up from the Internet.

If they had anything to teach, they were mostly made-up grand sounding international relation system scams, voodoo theories and puffed-up wonders of American political culture that he himself had picked from wood-panelled bigoted racist institutions as Yale where he had attended. His education, BTW, was also paid for and sponsored by the Chinese peasant class.

Today, in his old age, still dragging around his shrivelled prick, Victor the Gao has only China left to look forward to, that is, get rich. To Gao, being rich is, you see, being White.

*

*

3. THE LILY TRAP

Bringing America into Beijing, brings America’s troubles and genocidal wars into China. It wouldn’t matter who is president representing America. But that — importing America into China — is precisely the point in the intent of the two persons Jin Canrong and Victor Gao.

On June 24 and on June 27, they appeared in succession on guancha 观察者网 (screen shots above), a Banana website copied from MAGA’s Brietbart. They suggested that Trump visit Beijing on Sep 3 for the Tiananmen military parade marking the defeat of Japan and other fascist forces in China and neighboring countries.

• Jin’s suggestion was packaged as an article, its title faked as a question: “特朗普总统，访华行程何不选在九月三日？/ President Trump, why not choose September 3 to visit China?”

• Gao’s response three days later replies to Jin, like two street dogs exchanging howls across an empty town in the night: “如果特朗普来参加九三阅兵，对他本人和中美关系都是好事 / If Trump attends the Sep 3 military parade, it would be good for him and Sino-US relations.”

In throwing out the suggestion, the two Bananas were clearly at the wrong place, addressing the wrong people and in a wrong language. They could just say so on their YouTube platforms. Or, write that invitation in Brietbart. Or, they could simply tweet it out, as is fashionable these days when Trump conducts US foreign policy.

But any of that would defeat their purpose as US agents, today serving MAGA: they are suppose to turn around the Chinese so they’d look up to America, specifically one named Donald Trump. And if they are going to take money from Americans, they best prove, in writing, that they are doing what’s paid to them — propaganda inside China. If they had sung the same tune at Brietbart, they would be just dogs howling at each other across the same street.

The two men weren’t addressing Trump, anyway. If there was such an invitation from president Xi Jinping, say — and we know there wasn’t any — then Trump would have accepted right away, his reply tweeted from Truth Social. Given this is true, why? What could be the Banana plot and the intent in pushing to the Chinese public an agenda of a new White king on a Tiananmen Chinese throne?

The answers to those questions are easy to determine. One has only to know where to look, that is, by asking what, not who, are these two men peddling American and White power to the Chinese public.

*

4. AMERICA’S FORBIDDEN CITY AGENTS

To formulate US foreign policy, American political, corporate and financial circles employ “think tanks.” In their actual functions, these are job creation centers, or they act as hold-overs for those fired and retired, and as propaganda distributors.

In their propaganda role, the like of Brookings and Atlantic Council are most (in)famous. They provide grandiose theoretical justifications for war and peace, padding them to decisions already made. The justifications (think John Mearsheimer, George Kenan) supply an academic sheen and respectability to decisions affecting life and death abroad.

Not only does academic patina becomes a cover for actual US imperial conquests and plunders, the think tanks present those decisions as well-considered, rationale outcomes, serving the national interest. That is, they lie. Given the plethora of think tanks and idle Mearsheimers without gainful and useful employment, there is never a shortage of theoretical justifications for mass murder abroad.

Examples are endless: the US backing of the Gaza massacre; the creation of a Greater Israel, or US intervention in 80 countries worldwide since 1945 (partial list below) or, in the past two decades, the blowing up seven Muslim countries from Libya to Iran.

In China, however, there is no such pathway or route in formulating foreign (or domestic) policies. The reason simply is: China has no intent to occupy other people’s property. No intent, no need for think tanks to create deceit and to supply academic justifications.

In contrast to the US where decisions are dictatorial and top-down, domestic Chinese policies generally emerge bottom up. These emerge when ideas are seeded among CPC cadres, community centers, government departments or lessons learned of an unexpected event or disaster. They then go up the process chain, reaching working groups, sub-groups and specialist groups, all straddling the CPC and the national parliament, the National People’s Congress 中华人民共和国全国人民代表大会.

In the structure just described who eventually decides on those foreign policies suggestions and how? A short answer is, nobody and nothing. Foreign affairs are simply extensions of domestic decisions/policies, the first serving the second.

A current example is the trade war with the US. China’s willingness to stand up to the US stems from:

• (a) dedollarizing China’s external trade not just with the US but the rest of the world, and

• (b) encouraging domestic exporting factories to shift their production to neighbors and friends, as China gradually replace western, especially US markets. Ditto critical or rare earth mineral sales.

Enter Victor ‘Banana’ Gao et al. Modelled after the Americans, their think tanks (Center for China and Globalization or CCG) don’t ever think, even assuming they know how.

Hence, no original scholarships ever come out of Chinese think tanks like CCG. One has only to click on one of its links to see that it exist simply to redistribute western (mostly American) neo-liberal political agenda talking points. Top of these being, to expand corporate economic rents.

Even though principles of economic rents are well established in classical economics, Gao et al don’t and aren’t able to deliver countervailing ideas. It was never their intent anyway to challenge an expropriating, exploitative American economic system even if they knew how to do so.

So what do these Chinaman deliver for China and in China?

Nothing! Gao et al exist to import into China the same American recipes for failures; whether they know what it is they are doing is beside the point. In another word, these motherfuckers are just US political distribution agents.

One reason they are limited to that role is that the Gaos don’t have much intellectual space to operate in China. If they find a Chinese audience, it’s largely a captive one, in university classrooms for example.

But, they do have a western audience from which the same Brookings doctrinal poison would seep into China, from the outside in, starting at the Ministry of Commerce where large US banks, hedge funds and tech companies queue up to have an audience with the Minister and so to be let in with favorable status such as lower taxes, subsidized inputs and long-term land leases.

Aside, therefore, from their role in recycling and in redistributing US liberal doctrinaire, the Gaos are the gatekeepers of foreign access to the Chinese largesse and market. These motherfuckers are found nowhere else nor in any other Chinese economic sectors.

To see what all this influence peddling mean, contrast the function of the Gaos to China’s most important economic sector, namely digital products using high-technology in AI, wave communications and related fields. It is a sector where top Chinese minds actually do useful work, serving the Chinese population and the world in general.

Consider just one example (out of thousands): the physicist Zhang Shoucheng 张首晟, 1963-2018 (below).

A contemporary of Gao (born 1962), Zhang was raised in China, Shanghai, studied in the US, and researches out of a private equity company (Danhua Capital) that’s devoted entirely to bring into daily use quantum mechanics.

Unlike Gao, Zhang has no Brookings political agenda to sell because the actual and real physical sciences has no space for the western intellectual poison that people like Victor Gao resells out of London.

And, unlike Gao, Zhang is not rich but dead.

5. SUPERPOSITIONING DISAPPEARED

With his experimental work out of Fudan and Stanford universities, Zhang had been working with Huawei to introduce quantum superpositioning into communication and consumer devices. Once successful, superpositioning would be able to handle digital terabyte data as fast as light — some say faster, that is, the light bulb comes on before you take your forefinger off the switch!

Such quantum devices were at the cusp of commercial application when, out of the blue, Zhang was found and declared dead outside his San Francisco home on Dec 1, probably killed by the CIA. This is not far fetch considering how routinely the US and Israel kill scientists everywhere, in Iran most recently where more than a dozen nuclear scientists were blown up in a single day.

Two days before his death, Zhang had met Meng Wanzhou 孟晚舟 in Hong Kong, the Huawei founder’s daughter who was subsequently framed and entrapped by the US regime on phony charges, for supposedly breaking American laws selling China-made handsets to Iran. The two had left town the same day. Zhang was to return to his Danhua applications research lab in the US while Meng, stopping in Vancouver, Canada, was abducted also on Dec 1. (Zhang’s death was reported in Chinese media 美国华裔物理学家张首晟教授去世，终年55岁_科学湃_澎湃新闻, 2018, Dec 6.)

At every step of the way, one sees Donald Trump’s foot print: ZTE, Huawei, Meng and Zhang, ASML, TSMC chips, death, abduction, theft, lawfare, extortion, hostage taking, genocide. This is the American political culture that the Gaos and the Jins import into China.

Worse, Trump’s prints run non-stop, from 2016 to the present when in June he held hostage 277,000 Chinese students in the US, threatening to deport all them unless China sell it critical minerals (used in US weapons to kill Gaza kids daily).

Above are screen capture samples of Chinese search results that reveal American society to the Chinese. Not one is favorable to America. Instead they show:

• its liberal democracy is a lie,

• human rights a lie,

• maintenance of global peace a lie (image list below),

• free trade a lie,

• fair competition a lie,

• academic freedom a lie,

• rule of law and sanctity of contract a lie,

• freedom of speech a lie,

• MAGA, too, is a lie.

It being stolen property, America was never anyone’s home, and so it counted for nothing if everyone lied. Lying is instead a requisite, an injunction to live, even in the best of times when America was just jinshan 金山 where the Guangdong Chinese went to dig for gold and then leave.

Of course, not all Chinese share that sentiment about America, a sentiment easily refuted in the US military which, in White mythology, is everybody’s penultimate testing ground of loyalty to country. In the Chinese political ethic of guojia 国家, however, the military expresses an ideal far exceeding the White notions of national loyalty. The ethic instead makes loyalty a practical matter, tying and rolling into one, the state (or ruler), nationhood and family.

But what if like democracy, like human rights, and assorted other White Man’s exorbitant, heavenly claims, the US military is also a lie in testing a man’s loyalty?

First, however, the lie has to reveal itself. It does so when a Chinese American finds that loyalty is absent as a requisite for joining the military.

The problem, though, isn’t in detecting the absence of a soldier’s loyalty. Rather it’s what the lie does to the Chinese: It shatters into a million pieces the ethic of guojia 国家. Not only that the notions of state, nation and family don’t actually exist, or functionally exist, in America, they actually get together then turn around to work against him.

In the circumstance, there’s no escape! The Chinese kills himself!

In the US, that event — a Chinese American soldier killing himself — merited no great, serious attention until White people were involved. A Chinese American dead in his own hands was just one of thousands of suicide cases in the military. These people are worth nothing to deserve ink space.

But not in the Chinese media when the story reached them. Even when it was long past, by a dozen years, everybody still wanted to know, why? (This article for example.) The reason for this never-ending curiosity is that the military is where one dies in the hands of the enemy while protecting and preserving guojia 国家; now, instead, the soldier dies in his own hand, in essence, blowing up guojia 国家 to which he is a member and part thereof.

The case of Danny Chen 陈宇晖 (above), it seems, had started in an army camp washroom in Afghanistan. When he finished his shower, it is said he left the faucet still dripping and the water heater switched on. Later, surrounded by a group of soldiers, all White, he was confronted by their officer, also White, accusing him for failing discipline. Then they beat him half dead, calling him names and hurling more imsults at the same time. The abuses continued for at least one more month in spite of complaints to senior officers. At the end of which, when alone, he shot himself through the head.

And all that, incredulous as it seems, over a shower?

Who dares says the soldier’s death (within a year of him joining the army in 2011) had nothing to with Trump’s Mearsheimerian realist balance of power politics? Who dares says the case had nothing to with Trump (and the US regime) tagging racist labels to the Chinese for all sorts of things, espionage in universities, in research labs and now, to the White officer, in the military? Who dares says it had nothing to do with Trump blaming Chinese for the Covid epidemic, the trade deficit, oil, Ukraine, arming Russia, even after he bombs Iran?

The soldier’s death was classic Mearsheimerian theory-justification over a shower faucet. The US is a regime that cannot function unless it picks on someone non-stop, best of all Chinese.

It’s under this pall of a sick America that White Man’s Ching Chong Chinaman — Victor Gao and Jin Carong — find their uses in China.

Like the moral character of the Americans and White people they imitate, they see nothing wrong in the deceit they employ against the Chinese in their guancha 观察者网 articles. That is, Gao and Jin were deceiving everyone to believe they had sincerely written to persuade Trump to visit Beijing when, instead, they were actually burnishing America’s image and shoe shining Trump to prepare the local population to receive a genocidal murderer and a racist bigot.

The Gao & Jin motherfuckers would have understood the Chinese heart. Which is that the worse of times is also the best of times to turn relationships around.

What better time to promote Trump than it is now when the world is against him? What better occasion, what better place, and what better time than the present moment to have all 1.4 billion Chinese watch the profile of a murderous presidential racist bigot not just whitewashed but veiled over and then sanctified — and that on sacred Chinese grounds to boot!

In support of their campaign to install Trump at Tiananmen, Jin and Gao dropped into some Chinese websites the idea that the “US has never before invaded China / 美国从来没有侵略过中国”. It was a lie. (Images below. Also see this article for example.)

Of course, Trump standing beside Xi Jinping on the Tiananmen rostrum was never about repairing Sino-US relations since it is as clear as day as to who, why and how the damage to relations had started in the first place. That this damaged relations had happened not by accident the Gaos and Jins would have known because Trump’s policies actually followed countless policy prescriptions all mapped out in American think tanks they had themselves modelled after.

Even presuming Trump was desirous of a war-free and a tension-free relationship with China, it was never entirely up to him. Trump doesn’t alone run US foreign policy, nor can he.

*

Above, US Ninth Infantry riding through Beijing (then called Peking), 1900, hauling in supplies. Source: US Military Academy, West Point. Below, US troops camping on the grounds of the Forbidden City. Beyond the walls is Tiananmen Square.

*

6. CENTER FOR CHINAMERICA & GLOBALIZATION

By now, nobody even knows or remembers what is it about the US policy that demands to confront China, starting with Barack Obama’s “pivot to Asia” a dozen years ago.

If there was even any rationale in US policy, conceived whether a dozen years ago or the version today, why has the Reason changed but not the US objective? When does Object precede Reason? Did the Chinese steal from the Americans? Did the Chinese give offense? Had it stepped on some American tail; organized an insurrection; staged a riot in front of Capitol Hill? There are Chinese long range missiles stationed in Cuba?

Nobody can tell. All that anybody can see or hear are US policy acts of confrontation, occasionally as physical threats of annihilation, conducted at an almost daily rate too numerous to count them here.

What’s also self evident, that is, plain for all to see, is that the US confrontation is driven almost entirely by its racist bigotry. Confrontation is today so normal it’s trite to even recount them

So in the same way that the US Congress and White House drives their China relations as racist bigots, their Banana underlings, the Gaos and the Jins, look at China, not at the US, from the flip side of White Man’s doctrinal and theoretical lenses.

Hence, one gets loads of pontificating from these motherfuckers: mistrust must be tackled, China and US should communicate more often, business and finance should liberalize and “open up” (whatever that is), people-to-people relations should step up, with more student exchanges and on and on and on and on.

The reason for retelling the same bucket of shit, regurgitated a million times, for god knows how long is because the Gaos and the Jins have no other way to see the truth in the China-US relationship.

No other way because behind American racist bigotry driving US confrontation, there is nothing. Similarly, behind Banana’s doctrinaire copied from their White masters, there’s also nothing: no ethical foundations, no epistemological understanding, no red lines, no appreciation of cultures, not even their own which they know as much as a taxi driver in Timbuktu.

At the front of their theoretical American lenses that the Gaos and the Jins had bought from one John Mearsheimer, they see war, preparations of war and threats of war.

All this leaves a lot of wriggle room for the Gaos and Jins. It frees them to tell everyone, from Xi Jinping down, anything and everything but, above all, lies: US troubles with China come from misunderstanding; China must be patient; the Americans will come round to seeing the errors of their ways; China must mitigate American fears, win their trust; co-operation must increase and by-the-way…

“BlackRock has just applied for a broker’s license and JP Morgan Chase would like to be a dealer for the Peope’s Bank of China. What do you think, comrade Wang? …

“Last night, we got word from MAGA that Trump would like to come on Sep 3. It’s a wonderful opportunity for us. Soon we will have Trump in our pockets. What do you think, comrade Li Qiang? …”

They omit of course to tell Xi that Trump and Republicans had just lost New York City to a brown skin man, one Zohran Kwame Mamdani, a socialist to boot.

You can find the above talking points splashed out in the web pages of the Center for China and Globalization. The CCG was set up precisely for that kind of role, as distributor of Democrat Party think tank snake oil and, more pertinently, for the National Endowment for Democracy (NED) that was responsible for the Hong Kong 2019 riots. It was through NED auspices that the neo-con warmonger Francis Fukuyama was brought into China and taken on a tour of Beijing universities by one Prof Zhang Weiwei, another imitation White Anglophile, making money from spinning tales of geopolitics.

The Gaos and the Jins are personifications of Chinese Orientalism.

They are to China what westernized liberal Iranians (president Masoud Pezeshkian is an example) are to Iran, a class who had bet their entire lives, even the Fate of their nation on the White Man. They directly led Iran to the present mess.

The Gaos and the Jins are too deeply enmeshed into and indoctrinated by the West to act inside China independent of grandiose White theories of war and peace. They are the Chinaman Catholic priests offering absolutions in the morning and fucking choir boys in the nights to make a difference or dent the reputation of the Church of America.

They are in China to till Chinese souls, to prepare everyone for an American corporate and financial takeover. (See this for example: “The roots of American political conduct / 美国行为的根源,” 红色文化网 2025 Jun 28.)

Even if takeover fails, they are betting on the chance to at least crystallize a semblance of G2, if not then the real thing — a China and America locked together in heart and mind to rule the world and split the proceeds. They imagine not just unimaginable riches but that the G2, with them at the center, would be masters of a new universal order, unassailable on all and any front.

This explains why America’s Chinese agents are congregated in the Commerce Ministry, the only entry point into China for the White Man to shape, manipulate and influence laws and policies on land, finance, trade, money supply and the stock markets. But, like Democrats, like the Obamas and Clintons, they fear their unipolar dream break up, taking down with it the big American companies and banks.

At this point of unipolar crisis, China comes in. So, the Gaos and Jins imagine themselves in a grand Chinese role, which is to save America if only to bring intact an America into China.

It is this role that makes China’s Commerce Ministry so insidious and, therefore, more powerful, more than Wang Yi’s foreign ministry, even defense.

7. CHINAMERICA G2

In 2002, Chen Jian 陈健 was named as Number 2 to the Ministry of Foreign Economic Relations and Trade 对外贸易经济合作部. It was a surprise choice because, prior to appointment, he had only worked as an embassy hack in two countries, Guinea-Bissau and Argentina. By the following year, 2003, the ministry was totally revamped, adopting its present name (in Chinese 商务部) and orienting China’s trade almost exclusively to the US. The same year, Chinese purchases of US Treasuries took off, peaking at US$1.3 trillion worth ten years later (chart above) in 2013 when Xi Jinping became China’s president.

Chen Jian today works alongside Henry Wang, Victor Gao, Jin Canrong at the CCG US offshore, globalist propaganda arm.

With China’s domestic economy under overall direction of the prime minister Li Qiang 李强, the Commerce Ministry has gained enormous powers.

Li Qiang had in 2023 succeeded Li Keqiang 李克强 who, at the height of his pro-West rule, allowed George Soros to run rampant around China, coddled Ali Baba’s Jack Ma, even visited Israel to encourage Benjamin Netanyahu, for instance, by building the Haifa port for the genocidal regime.

Heading the Commerce Ministry today is Wang Wentao 王文涛, who led the Chinese delegation to meet the US on trade, first in Geneva then in London.

Under minister Wang, Gao and Jin are able use Commerce to whitewash past American crimes by flipping around its more popular image in China, that of US corporations and finance.

This lifts US standing in China in spite of its genocidal spree conducted around the world. A most common way this is done is, display American image in the persons of Tim Cook and Elon Musk. Every few months their photos are splashed all over Chinese media shaking hands with Wang and other Commerce Ministry officials.

Putting Trump on a Tiananmen pedestal would be their crowning achievement.

Lobbying and influence peddling in China do more than whitewash Trumpian genocide. The Gaos and Jins are able to introduce and then insert into Chinese consciousness the subtle American mechanics of rent extraction — all done without ever mentioning the hated term, liberal economics.

This American use of Anglophile Bananas to infiltrate and then mold Chinese society into the image of US doctrine is hardly far fetched. Top Chinese universities (Peking U, Tsinghua, Renmin, Fudan) are the main recruiting grounds for the CIA looking to pay handsomely to any disgruntled Chinese. The evangelical Christian Hu Xijin 胡锡进, a CPC member himself, admitted to this fact, inadvertently, of course.

At another corner of China is Hong Kong. There, it showcases the perfect formula and model for US corporate and financial interests to suck dry local wealth and financial assets then transfer all this back to the US through purchases of US Treasuries. And nobody would know it. Or feel a thing about the theft.

Stripped of its glittering waterfront facade, Hong Kong is a US mercantile vassal state, in the same way Israel functions as an American aircraft carrier in West Asia.

China’s Commerce Ministry is the door through which the US reaches into the Forbidden City political elite and its vast bureaucracy. Pass that door it is easy to reach the vast store of Chinese wealth and assets, a cumulative total of 5,000 years worth stacked up.

All this answers why Li Qiang is perennially in Davos for the World Economic Forum, and Wang is the primary Chinese globalist contact point for the like of JP Morgan Chase, Citibank and BlackRock. Everyone envisages a G2, China and America joined at the hips, a duopoly power presiding over the world. Saliva dripping from their mouths, the CCG fellows imagine a Center for Chinamerica and Globalization.

Playing their part, the Victor Gao and Jin Canrong are the Made-in-USA door stoppers to keep Tiananmen’s 中南海 zhongnanhai doors always open to USA.

Gao’s sponsor-in-chief is Ronnie Chan, no coincidence a real estate developer from Hong Kong and a pro-Zionist, pro-genocidal Israeli backer, a relationship that goes back years. Chan effectively owns Asia Society, and operates it, like he owns CCG where he makes regular appearances alongside the think tank president and Gao’s chief collaborator, one named Henry Wang. (His CCG homepage here.)

CCG’s intent are spelled out openly by Wang, Gao, Jin, et al: They want to tie China and the US into an indistinguishable pair of globalist powers, modelled after the American system, of course. Hence, one finds the following in CCG:

• The use of academic exchange as a legal cover to settle a first batch of 50,000 young Americans inside China, like America settling Jews to occupy Palestine (see The Economist, 2020 Mar 12);

• To break up the aggregation of Chinese land holdings, especially those state-own and collective farmland, so as to pave the way for private, including foreign ownership.

• To privatize important Chinese economic sectors by the liberal globalization of finance, insurance, household loans (recall Ali Baba’s digital attempt to corner the entire market) and foreign exchange.

Trump’s act in itself, standing in Tiananmen overlooking a march past, could do little to advance American terms in a G2 agenda. It might not even burnish his own image and constituency base at home, although he would be entitled to claim, as he so often does, he had “open up” China for American corporates and finance.

But, Trump is not the Victor Gao object of Trump on a Tiananmen pedestal. He is the instrument to soften Chinese perception of a bully America.

In China, the Gaos and the Jins play the exact same lobbying role as American think tanks that they admire and had modelled CCG after, namely: propaganda distribution, theoretical justifications, perception management, ideological indoctrination, and buying political favors.

Or, to restate the same thing more plainly: to corrupt Chinese society from bottom up, and thence to make easier for the top to change laws and policies, handing these out top down.

8. IS XI JINPING LOSING IT?

Victor Gao’s influence peddling often butter both sides of the bread.

So that he would turn up in Tiananmen, Trump must be convinced to even ask Xi to attend Sep 3. And, after which, to made hard for Xi to avoid sending an invitation if the Chinese public were to clamor for Trump’s presence. After all, as Gao and Jin claim, Trump’s presence is in the interest of Sino-US relations.

These kinds of dirty White Man tricks are totally new in Chinese polity: stirring up public sentiments to put pressure on the central government at 中南海 zhongnanhai. Manufacturing public consent was never necessary in Chinese policy making if the said policy served the people’s interest to begin with.

But that it has now been put to use will have far reaching ramifications.

American interference in China, via Gao, Jin, et al, will easily grow as its effectiveness also grows for the reason the Chinese leadership is very susceptible to popular demand.

This susceptibility is cultural and is as old as the Chinese state, as encapsulated in the Mandate of Heaven that was first written down in the Zhou era some 3,000 years ago.

In spite of variations over time, the Mandate’s core principle has remained, which is for the State to prize, above all else, bringing peace and prosperity to the land. These objectives intrinsically require the State to harmonize public interests. But this can’t even start until it first listen to and respond to public sentiments.

In the US and in the West however, no consent is ever needed to act if consent is neither a demand nor an injunction on their regimes. Even the manufacture of consent would be unnecessary, a banal exercise if Trump could simply write an Executive Order and then to make up the excuses or lie his way out decisions already made.

To lure Trump into turning up at Tiananmen is as easy as tempting a dog with a butcher’s slab of meat. A choice piece of Shanghai water front real estate for The Trump Organization would be enough to lure him to Tiananmen, ever if it were never to happen. Trump easily bought is something everybody knows, not just Arabs but the Viets, too (article below, dated 2025 Jun 25), if the US is to lower clothing and jean tariffs.

In this way, the Gaos and Jins know they have broken new ground, ending the Chinese taboo against selling property to foreigners and so to open up China to a western land grab.

Such brazen attempts by Gao and Jin to plot a grand sale of the Chinese nation solves a long-held puzzle over how the US is ever going to contain China. The answer is, sell China to break it up. If a regime change follows, that’s a bonus.

That Gao and Jin has managed to even come this far in fulfilling America’s geopolitical agenda is foreboding — for Xi Jinping. At Tiananmen, Trump would be an equal to Mao Zedong whereas Xi will play second fiddle.

The inference that Gao and Jin is usurping CPC power, starting with Xi, can only mean Li Qiang is backing them, with lots of other officials bought off by Hong Kong real estate interest. This raises in turn a question: Is Xi losing ground in his fight with the Anglophile CPC liberals?

Small wonder that CGTN, media arm of the Chinese liberal Victor Gao class, has been frequently portraying Xi as a retired CPC figure, happily touring the country like he is tourist on retirement time.

In other portrayal, Xi is depicted as a country bumpkin. In them, he is pictured, also as a retiree, returning to the village to be “with the people” while Li Qiang works the globalist circuit to sell more critical mineral metals to Trump, visit western, White globalists in Davos, and prepare the Chinese for a grand national closing down sale, starting in the farms. (See this CGTN video for example dated 2025 Jun 15 that recycles images of Xi’s visit to the far flung villages, four, five, six years ago!)

This urban Chinese class disdain for Chinese peasants, peasant-hood and rural life explains why Victor Gao was virulently against Vance for calling Chinese peasants — even though a true statement.

Like Vance, like nearly all White people, the Anglophile Gao thinks lowly of peasants. He sees himself instead as the sophisticated honorary White Man who knows how to fold his dinner napkin and use the folk and knife to cut a slab of prime Kentucky T-bone steak.

Gao’s sense of White superiority and White preferred racism is seen everywhere in the US vassal state of Hong Kong.

There, tycoons like Jimmy Lai (image below in Washington during the first Trump rule) and Li Ka-shing (in the sale of the Panama Canal ports fame) look down on Mainland Chinese, before the latter got rich. They see them simply as invading hungry locusts (poster image in Hong Kong below).

US-financed street rioters during the 2019 riots hurl the same insults at mainland Chinese caught, unfortunately and accidentally, in the middle a petrol bomb attack on a Tsimshatsui police station. To get past a street barricade manned by NED-paid rioters, passers-by must speak either in Cantonese or English; putonghua, the national dialect is banned. Rioters favorite targets were taxi drivers because their passengers were overwhelmingly mainland tourists from Zhuhai and other coastal ports, disembarking from ferries in the Kowloon terminal 中港城 and Shun Tak. All street-front shops torched and destroyed were from the mainland: Bank of China, China Mobile, and so on (below).

Like the Jimmy Lais before, the Victor Gaos and Ronnie Chans today till the ground for a pro-US agenda but, this time, topped by an anti-peasantry bigotry. This time, too, the US agenda is carried out right in the Chinese heartland and at the center of Chinese power, not on the periphery of Hong Kong.

The Gaos, Chans and the Trumps have no truck for peasants because it is peasantry land they want. As cities expand and grow, the Victor Gao class are pushing at the farmland gates, hammering at them to get in and pick off prized choices of real estate.

At this rate of expropriation, Xi will have to retire farther and farther away from the city, moving from the Shanxi wheat fields to Shaanxi cave. Poor fella.

*

9. TIANANMEN TRUMP

For the Confucianists of the CPC in particular, Trump’s presence in Tiananmen will be a nerve wrecking event. Which is, watching a contingent of US soldiers march down Chang’an Avenue 长安街.

The last time they did so was 1900. By the time the soldiers left, the Qing government was tottering on collapse, effectively ending not only the Chinese state but 3,000 years of a guojia 国家.

What does US military presence at Tiananmen mean to Chinese? For the answer, it must be prefaced as follows:

Countless millions of PLA predecessors have died fighting Trump‘s ilk, the fascists, the Whites, the honorary Whites, and their plundering White regimes. How could any Chinese forget the mass murders and plunders that have been repeated so frequently, notably 1839-1840, 1856-1859, the 1860 burn-and-looting of the Summer Palace, 1900 ransack of the Forbidden City, 1950 crossing at Yalu river, the 1951-1972 US occupation of Taiwan, the Tiananmen coup attempt of 1989, the 2011-2016, 3,200 terrorist attacks across China, one at the Tiananmen Gate.

Jin Canrong’s excuse for letting an American, such as Trump, occupy, even for a moment, Tiananmen had rested entirely on this passage in his article. Translated from the Chinese, it reads:

“In January 1942, then US President Franklin D. Roosevelt [FDR] emphasized China's role in his first State of the Union address after the Pearl Harbor incident. He said: ‘We fought side by side with the brave Chinese people — millions of Chinese have withstood the ravages of bombing and starvation for four and a half years, ignoring Japan's advanced equipment and weapons, and repelled the invaders again and again.’”

The justification is so incredulously stupid, by an American studies “professor-expert” at that, one might just as well ignore it. But, for the record:

• Why should the words of an American president matter to China’s liberation?

• Why should his words matter in a war which American took no part but had gone on for 12 years before Pearl Harbor and before FDR was even president?

• Why should America count when it had instead fueled Japan’s war efforts against China with provisions of iron ore, steel, fuel oil, weapons and weapons design?

• Who the fuck is FDR? And who the fuck does Jin Canrong think he is, changing American morality to suit an American agenda, and lying about Chinese history?

FDR had inherited wealth so he never have to work a day in his life. But where had that money come from?

It was from his grandfather Warren Delano who until the outbreak of war ran a drug racket out of Hong Kong along with the East India Company or EIC.

“From drug dealer Warren Delano to his grandson Franklin Delano Roosevelt, from the port of Hong Kong to the towers of Princeton University,” America got rich on the backs of poisoning the Chinese population.

That sentence is a blurb in James Bradley’s The China Mirage: The Hidden History of American Disaster in Asia (Back Bay Books, 2016).

The prominent Americans who made their fortunes from the China opium trade is as long as an entire five-star hotel laundry list. Bradley’s work was singularly about Americans who since the 1850s, “good Christians all,” he said at the lunch of his book, “profitably addicted millions, [while] American missionaries arrived, promising salvation for those who adopted Western ways.”

Worse than acting as an apologist for American imperialism, Jin is the seed of an American, westernized class implanted inside the centers of Chinese central power. He is not unlike the Iranian liberals who has gotten Iran into its present mess. (But, thank you for exposing yourself, Jin. Now, we want the head of that motherfucker before he does any more damage to China’s security and sovereign interest!)

It gets worse… because it was at Tiananmen Square that, employing a clandestine Asia CIA network run by James Lilley (1928-2009), the US regime attempted a violent coup in June 1989 using Beijing university students to lay siege on and cripple Beijing day-to-day life.

Lilley personally supervised, hence led, the coup attempt the moment he arrived early, Apr 20, to take up his post as US ambassador on May 8. Lilley naturally denied any involvement. But his personal and professional track record shows otherwise, evidential record available in Taiwan because for over a decade he had, from Taipei, headed a CIA regional, east and south Asia-wide operations. Operating out of Taiwan, Lilley became a peddler for heroin cultivated and refined on the Laos-Myanmar-China Yunnan border, infamously known as the Golden Triangle.

For some 20 years until Nixon’s visit to China in 1972, Lilley flew regularly to India, entering Tibet from there to organize and pay with US Dollar cash the recruitment of a pseudo-Tibetan and a half Indian armed rebellion against China. The program, funded by proceeds from Golden Triangle, failed for lack of recruits. (See, James and Jeffrey Lilley, China Hands, 2005. Public Affairs.) But it recalls the “Contra affair” wherein Central American drug proceeds was used to finance regime change in Iran.

Jin has his US imperial agenda to thrust Trump into Chinese political consciousness.

But, like many US agents embedded today in Chinese universities, and busy soaking up White immorality, it never occurred to him that Trump on a Tiananmen balustrade isn’t just in bad taste. Trump is last person from hell to even clean toilets in Tiananmen.

More than that, the Gaos and the Jin revealed betrayal, and the lengths to which they would go, pissing on the venerated Tiananmen like dogs piss on a lamppost.

If a Chinese wanted a post-modern liberation hero, they already have one, found without having to cross an ocean: Yahya Sinwar (below). At the denouement, Sinwar looks at the enemy in the eye especially when Death called.

*

10. FASCIST CHING CHONG GODS

It is plainly apparent to some in China why the Gaos and Jins would want to rehabilitate America in front of the Chinese using a stupid Trump.

Plainly apparent because Jin doesn’t ask to have Joe Biden stand at Tiananmen. Only Trump counts: tall, blonde hair, blonde children, a tall slender wife, rich, real estate mogul, running MAGA. He merges doctrinal neo-conservatism and White-first racism.

Trump falls into the same racist caricature image carried for 160 years in Hong Kong, today passed on to the Ching Chong Chinaman in Jin, in Victor Gao, in Henry Wang, and in the tycoon Ronnie Chan.

After Tiananmen, the Jins and Chans will want to install Trump’s image ontop the Temple of Heaven. That place would be far better than the corrupted Nobel Prize Trump hankers after; better because it speaks to immortality and the purity of the heart. And why not? To the Jins and Chans, Trump is pure White extraordinaire. Whether he is Marxist (see the MAGA videos below) or Landlord-in-Chief is beside the point.

Trump’s whiteness seems to fascinate Vladimir Putin who speaks of a “Golden Billion” in an era of the final stage of imperialism, that is, the imperialism not just of Anglo-America but of the White Man.

Also invited to Tiananmen for Sep 3 is Putin. Would he mind Trump’s presence? Hardly, one would think, because here at last is the prospect of a great G3 alliance — that is, before MAGA and the Bananas get ahead of him with G2. Should that happen Russia is fucked.

On their part, the Jins, Gaos and Wangs want not to look at Trump in the eye because that would be impossible when they bow and lick his feet. They’re in a hurry before the Democrats wave him goodbye, for no stupid man last forever.

Trump in Tiananmen would signal the start of a fundamental sea-change from a deeply embedded Chinese humanist culture to a warmongering Mearsheimerian realism. (John Mearsheimer is promoted in every Beijing university classroom, also by the Jins and Gaos.) This new indoctrination, once successful, would place the White Man at the Temple of Heaven pedestal, no longer as a predatory race whose past survival and prosperity had relied entirely on plundering the rest of the world.

The Jins and the Gaos see themselves as saviors of the White Race, starting with America, plucking Whitey out a western hell hole. This is what that motherfucker Victor Gao means when he says that Trump at Tiananmen “will be good for himself / 对他本人…是好事.”

Gao believes his endorsement of Jin Canrong’s idea would not only soften the hearts of 1.4 billion Chinese to a murderous USA but that a great number who think the world of White people would lavish praises on him for a brilliant idea (see Chinese web discussion at bottom of post). Indeed, he may be right: so fucked up are these Anglophiles and Bananas, they are like the White people they imitate.

If Trump in Tiananmen came to pass, it would be a betrayal of the memory of Yahya Sinwar and countless others, in China and abroad, who gave up so much to be free of America and fight its brutality and sadism.

But what do the Gaos and Jins care?

They have only to get Chinese on America’s side and America on China’s side.

September 3 is the 80th anniversary day we Chinese had selected to commemorate the victory of the Chinese People's War of Resistance against Japan. We take it also as the World Anti-Fascist War victory day.

But commemorations are just that, remembrance. Yet, in their memories the Chinese have always found deep meanings, three at the top of pecking order are: birth, marriage, death.

September 3 collapses all three into one: the melding of the Nation, birth of a new State and the empowerment of its People, the guojia 国家. It melds life and death, all bundled into an indistinguishable One. This is as ordered by the Mandate of Heaven (video below).

The 32-35 million Chinese who from 1931 to 1945 were killed must not die for nothing but so that the Chinese are reminded to remain true to themselves and to keep the promises we had pledged to our ancestors and forefathers.

Hence, the Sep 3 theme is: “铭记历史、缅怀先烈、珍爱和平、开创未来 / Remember History. Cherish the Memories. Welcome the Peace. Create the Future”. Within those memories are:

• July 7 incident,

• September 18 incident,

• October 25 restoration of Taiwan, and the

• December 13, the national day of public sacrifice for Nanjing.

*

• Motherland memories…

*

• Songs to our Motherland…

*

In video above is Chinese professor Zhang Weiwei, a Trojan Horse collaborator with Jin Canrong and Victor Gao. His conversation is with one Jackson Hinkle, supposedly a “prominent” figure in the MAGA movement, also seen in video below. Their discussions center on, what is MAGA (today totally discredited; see Trump’s tweet below about the NYC mayoral race, and related images); why are so many millennials and Gen Z becoming communists? (A MAGA lie.) And, how do the Chinese see MAGA? (Which, truth be told, 99.9 percent of the Chinese don’t give a fuck.)

*

*

*

*

• Below, Chinese websites discussing the Jin-Gao lily trap, set to entice Trump to Tiananmen…

*

• Personal Note: Busy with the business of living, Ji’an and her family still don’t know…. If they did, they, far more than angry, would be totally distressed and heart-broken: more than many, they have lost, given up and sacrificed so much. All the efforts of 44 generations flushed down the toilet because of some White imitating Anglophile motherfuckers.

*

• UPDATE. Preparing and rehearsing for Tiananmen Sep 3: It’s a torture but everybody is enthusiastic and excited, readying for our Motherland...

*