The People's Republic of China - For Sale! (Part 1)
Fallout from the Third Plenum: Is China privatizing land holdings? Where will the CPC begin sale of China? Why does it need money from US, UK banks? Did a deficit of money caused China's weaker GDP?
*
*
*
THE PRIVATIZATION OF AN INSURRECTION
On the face of it the questions above are unique, one different from the other. To those let’s add another: “Will Xi Jinping, head of the Communist Party of China (CPC) sell China to the highest private bidder, local or foreign?”
Outrageous the claims may be, yet they are the ramifications of the Central Committee’s Third Plenum (July 15-18) that has embroiled the party the past week.
The fault is with the Committee for being vague, convoluted, and open-ended in its public pronouncements (as this explanation, for example, warned). Regardless, some heads will roll, literally (we know who they are), and there will be a party purge from the prime minister Li Qiang down. The actual word being used (in translation) is, “clean-up”. “我建议…对隐藏在党内的那些与党同床异梦的国际资本代理人做一番认真的清理,” said a long-standing party member 武刚 Wu Gang.
This might not be enough because an internal purge pretend that traitors operate alone, even in this era of US-CIA regime change operations.
It pretends that the 15, 16-year-old students who threw Molotov cocktails into Hong Kong police stations do so out of their own volition and out of frustrations with the Carrie Lam government. The pretense ignores demonstrated facts: for example, Lam’s own husband Lam Siu-por openly expressed sympathies with the rioters; Li Ka-shing’s grocery store chain Park n’ Shop delivered, in company trucks no less, food supplies and drinks and medical masks to the rioters; and that, from the US and Taiwan, millions in cash flowed to the rioters, using the Anglican Church’s HSBC Hong Kong bank account.
Another, widespread interpretation — and it’s not without justifiable cause — has compared the internal provocations selling China to events preceding Tiananmen June 4, 1989, and Hong Kong 2019. Hu Xijin’s claims that the CPC will, post-Plenum, put an end to all public and State ownership is as clear as it is day.
If Hu is right, that is, he is not lying or even exaggerating, then all existing collective resources from land to buildings and everything in between will be sold to the highest bidder. From a school bag and a household washing machine to a battle tank, these will be privately made, delivered and owned. Schools, too, will be private and people will ride on roads with toll fees. The electricity grid, the waterworks, even the jails will be turned into private institutions, exactly as they are organized in the US — and also in Hong Kong where US financial interests own the city of 7 million, delivering fuel gas to privately constructed homes, and owning buses, the MTR trains and above all, vast stretches of land and all property construction.
The CPC’s call for liberalizing China’s economy, especially to free up land for sale, has a precedent, going back from 1980 to 2010.
Li Ka-shing 李嘉誠 was notorious in Guangdong where he bought, for cheap, large swathes of farmland on promises to build factories. Three years passed, not a brick was laid. Then five years. At the sixth year, the municipal government issued an ultimatum, build your factory or move out. He resold the land at 15 times the price he paid for.
The same story, in countless cases, is repeated everywhere. Notorious of these cases are, for example, land billionaire Xu Jiajin 许皮带; the privatization to the Liu 柳 family of government appliance maker later renamed Lenovo 联想.
Behind every call for free market liberalization is an outright theft and defrauding of public and State properties; and subsequent calls are again matched by theft and fraud, theft and fraud, and theft and fraud. It never ends.
Not bad enough? Consider this: all the loot are remitted, in US Dollars, to offshore accounts invariably using Hong Kong banks wiring the proceeds to the US and onward to Cayman. There are, as at 2022, some 300 such outstanding millionaire fraud and money laundering cases pending in Chinese courts but can’t proceed because all 300 suspects in those cases have absconded to Hong Kong where colonial British law does not recognize nor permit repatriation of fugitives — an outright impunity for theft that the Hong Kong government still sticks to.
This latest wholesale privatization of China contained in Hu’s claims exactly matches the privatization demands of the cabal of real estate developers and foreigner bankers run out of Hong Kong by Hang Lung’s Ronnie Chan, acting in the name of Asia Society, a US organization.
Are these groups of people, one in the CPC, the other in the Hong Kong/Shanghai/US corporate sector, existing side by side, all issuing identical propaganda, mere coincidences? Some leaders in the CPC like to believe so, continuing with the pretence that Ronnie Chan means well, as did the Anglican Diocese of Hong Kong, praying for rioters in 2019?
But not anymore, now that Hu Xijin has stepped forward to call for the wholesale disposal of China, converting the State and the people’s land into private ownership. Even the CPC senior echelons cannot pretend anymore, unless they, too, are in cahoots with Americans to sell China.
Hence, the popular image (top of this page) of Hu Xijin pictured in the days before the clock was a household item. In it Hu is city time keeper, going from street to street beating the gong to inform the arrival of the morning or night. (You see the chief Tang-era time keeper in the Chinese film, 24 Hours in Chang’an.)
The Yankees are coming; every Chinese can see them coming even without Hu beating the gong these days. Hu, the gang of Asia Society members, Hong Kong bankers, with their endless beating of the private gongs are emblematic. They are emblematic in the last throw of the dice by the frustrated US regime so far failing to undermine and break up China from within.
No, it is not good enough to only purge the like of Hu. Enough is enough: China must leave no place, not even an inch, of its property to house and feather the real estate and banking cabal.
America has declared war on China but the CPC is still practising its taiji 太极拳 thing. Taiwan is working to declare independence. US troops are in Jinmen/Kinmen, within earshot. US medium range missiles are in the Philippines. Whiteys want to boycott Chinese cars and chips.
And China, meanwhile, is worried for the Hongkie Chans and the Time Keeper Hoos and the BlackRocks over which patch of land to sell to them, and for how much?
It’s time to end this charade.
The Chinese public want to know since when does the CPC own China? Which, where and what part of the People’s Republic of China will the Commerce Minister Wang Wentao begin selling to Hongkie developers and their American masters. How about a 10,000-km-long toll road on the Great Wall? That will clearly add value to China’s infrastructure, No? Not to mention billions more into the Chinese economy.
That CPC senior leaders, like Wang, should sit on his hands and let the narrative run is hardly surprising. Pro-US liberals in the CPC have Li Qiang to fly their liberal American flag in the Central Committee. Before him was Li Keqiang 李克强. True, liberals have had their setbacks, for example, the fall of Ma Yun, alias Jack Ma. And there’s Xi Jinping around to put their brakes on their Americanization of China.
But, with the US stepping up the pressure on multiple war fronts, CPC liberal factions, inside whom Hu is their chief propagandist, have been emboldened: the US global campaign, since also taken by Europe, to cripple China’s international trade worldwide, the US military at Beijing’s doorsteps (the Philippines joining in), and a weaker GDP growth.
Now the liberals are on to their final punch: seizing CPC’s domestic policies in one fell swoop. A proposed lock, stock and barrel sale of China would have the effect of the US attempts, conducted since 1949, sometimes surreptitiously, other times openly, to dismember the nation. There seems no other better way for the Yanks.
To be continued, Part 2: THE AMERICAN DREAM IN A CHINESE BED
The rest of this essay will dwell on far more fundamental issues that triggered the deliberations of the Third Plenum leading, in its turn, to Hu’s public calls for insurrection. Namely, this:
In the rush to double national per capita income in a dozen years to USD25,000, from some USD13,000 at present, is the CPC tip-toeing the entire nation, dragging it along, towards a western, in particular American, political paradigm?
….
Digression: VILLAGE OF MANY HUSBANDS
Clips below, a Tibetan Chinese village where the women can have two or more husbands, as many as four. If the Christian liberal Hu Xijin has his way and successfully takes over the land, the village would, under Christian domination, be eradicated. Such is the tyrannical cruelty of White societies that Hu imitates: They have no respect for other peoples.
The mountains and life style remind this author of Chongqing. In one of the interviews, the wife of two husbands said a single marriage dowry ranges from Rmb 20,000 to 50,000 which by China’s rural standard is about mid-range. Not a bad deal. The village is not rich, but they are happy. Fuck the Hongkies, the Whitey and their US Dollars who want their land and homes. We’ll join the villagers to first take the money and then kill these motherfuckers. We dare the CPC government to stop us! Hat tip to 安然户外旅行.
The third clip farther below is a more detailed report about polyandry but in another place, the stone and timber Naxi village of Er’ya outside Sichuan/Chongqing. In this fourth clip, meet the CPC’s village party secretary, a Naxi man himself!
*
***
Last clip, bottom: In honor of CPC 103. 祖国万岁！
*
***